WriterRae is working with multiple project deadlines at the moment, so pardon my lack of originality. However, this piece on fiscal stewardship came through my inbox this morning, and I thought it was relevant, given our government's passage of an obscenely irrelevant stimulus package. Not sure what exactly it's going to stimulate, probably private interest groups' coffers. Sad but likely true...
Taken from...IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, February 11, 2009
Stewardship and the Government
In a somewhat surprising juxtaposition, the language addressing parishioners' "stewardship" by the Roman Catholic Church is applicable in addressing "accountability" and "transparency" in relation to government. As defined by the Encarta Dictionary of English, "stewardship" is managing somebody else's property, finances, or household, guiding or directing a project to completion. The 10th Edition of the Bishops' stewardship letter reads, "accountability is essential to building a solid foundation for a (stewardship) program.” Unfortunately, stewardship and accountability is not always practiced.
Concerns about congressional stewardship were first expressed by Thomas Jefferson in 1796, warning that sending funds to local projects would be a "source of eternal scramble among the members, who can get the most money wasted in their State; and they will always get the most who are the meanest." In 1822 President James Monroe stated that federal money should only be spent on, "great national works, since if it were unlimited it would be liable to abuse and might be productive of evil." "Waste," "meanest," and "evil" would not be terms associated with good stewardship.
Government "stewardship" is managing taxation, accountability for spending funds, information transparency, and fair and open competition for funding. The most obvious demonstration of a lack of stewardship is found in earmarks. The official process for determining the federal budget is a three-step process of authorization, appropriation, and oversight. According to Congressman Jeff Flake (R-AZ), the earmark process has eliminated the authorizing and oversight work - Congress just appropriates.
Former Director of the OMB Jim Nussle, issued a statement concerning the FY2009 Senate budget, which is laughable now, "The budget resolution…adds $25 billion in new spending this year and $209 billion more over 5 years." Nussle and Flake’s remarks were uttered before the current trillion dollar stimulus was steamrolled through Congress, completely circumventing the standard process.
At the state level poor stewardship was demonstrated last year when Governor Culver and members of the majority Democrat party refused to submit a complete budget for consideration, instead only revealing sections as they passed them. Poorly managed projects, such as the Honey Creek Resort, raise additional questions.
In a demonstration of support for stewardship, every Republican Congressman recently voted against the stimulus bill. The Senate Republicans were not able to keep members focused on limited government and fiscal responsibility. Unfortunately, our children will reap what they have sown. As the Iowa Legislative session continues all citizens should be aware of stewardship issues and work to force government to improve stewardship of our money.
For further information see the Institute Policy Study, “Stewardship in Government Spending: Accountability, Transparency, Earmarks, and Competition.
The views expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of Public Interest Institute. They are brought to you in the interest of a better-informed citizenry.
Deborah D. Thornton, Research Analyst, Public Interest Institute, 600 North Jackson Street, Mt. Pleasant, IA 52641-1328. Phone: 319-385-3462. Web site: www.limitedgovernment.org.
E-mail: public.interest.institute@
limitedgovernment.org.
Recent Comments